🔗 Share this article

Via an unattributed order, the nation's top court cleared the way for Texas to employ a revised congressional boundary scheme that could add up to five new conservative-tilting districts. The 6-3 decision, released on Thursday, upholds a petition by the state to overturn a district court's block that had invalidated the redistricting plan in November.

Court's Reasoning

The lower court wrongly interjected itself into an active primary campaign, creating much confusion and disturbing the sensitive federal-state balance in elections, the justices wrote in detailing its decision.

The federal court had earlier ruled that Texas had probably sorted voters according to their race – a act known as unconstitutional racial sorting – when it adopted the redistricting plan. It had instructed the state to employ the boundaries created after the last decennial survey for the forthcoming election.

Sharp Dissenting Opinion

In a sharply worded dissent, Justice Elena Kagan took issue with the court's ruling. She argued that it undermined the work of the district court, pointing out that its decision was actually authored by a judge selected by former President Donald Trump.

Our position is above the district court, but our capability is not greater for resolving such fact-driven issues, Kagan stated in a opinion supported by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

Kagan added, This court's stay ensures that Texas's new map, with all its boosted favoritism, will dictate next year's elections. And it ensures that many Texas voters, for no good reason, will be placed in electoral districts due to their race. And that result, as this court has declared year in and year out, is a violation of the U.S. Constitution.

Countrywide Map-Drawing Battle

The ruling occurs during a countrywide fight over the remapping of electoral maps. Texas is a crucial component in pushes to alter the U.S. House map to protect a narrow Republican control. Usually, redistricting occurs after a decennial population count. Yet the move by Texas Republicans to proceed with a brazen mid-cycle redistricting earlier this year set off a series of events among other states.

Republicans in states like North Carolina and Missouri have also passed new maps that could add a number of more Republican-leaning seats. Democratic lawmakers, meanwhile, have pushed back with their own plans in states like California and Virginia, which might neutralize those projected gains.

Political Reactions

The Texas AG praised the supreme court ruling. In a release, he said the order defended Texas's basic authority to draw a map that secures electoral outcomes supportive of Republicans. We are setting the precedent for restoring our country, through each electoral district and individual state, he added.

In contrast, Democratic leaders lamented the ruling. The Court's approval of this extreme, racially gerrymandered Texas GOP map is profoundly disappointing, said the leader of a major party election organization.

A leading House figure said the court had once again eroded its credibility by upholding a racially gerrymandered map. Tonight's ruling by far-right justices on the supreme court is further proof that the extremists will do anything to rig the midterm elections. The gerrymandered Texas congressional map is a partisan and racially discriminatory power grab designed to subvert the will of the voters – particularly in Black and Latino communities, he added.